There are no server controls in MVC. Lot many options for Server Control Events : There are lot many events available for server controls like click, change, on-changing, binding, etc. Faster Development of Complex Pages : With the help of server controls and their server side events, it is very easy to develop a complex page with lot of interactive controls in a few hours.
Same will take comparatively more time in MVC. This also depends on the expertise of the developer on ASP. In these events, we can write our custom code to perform some actions at various stages of page cycle. There is page life cycle events in MVC. This gives developers better control over HTML and page design. Design time and run time variations are very few as compared to webforms. Better Page Load Time : Without viewstate, server controls and page life cycle events page load time in less in MVC as compared to webforms.
How To Make a Choice It entirely depends on the project requirement and expertise in technology. Disclaimer The author does not endorse one technology over the other.
LKC05 Technical Lead. First Prev Next Nice article, but Gary 9-Jan Member Jul Copy Code. Go to top. Layout: fixed fluid. File based URLs, physical existence of file required, e. Tight coupling between UI and code file, e.
Technical Lead. First Prev Next. Nice article, but Good article, but the section of "Advantages of ASP. It uses the Page Controller pattern that adds functionality to individual pages. MVC does not support view state. It supports view state on server based forms that can help us to manage state information. MVC has no specific page life cycle. All individual components such as Model, View and Controller have their own life cycle.
There is a specific page life cycle in the web form page. In MVC all three parts can be developed and worked independently. The components are tightly integrated. MVC is an extensible and pluggable framework. We can create our own view engine to render the view, we can also plug in a URL routing policy and other components.
A Web form does not support customized view engine. MVC follows the design of the stateless nature of the web. Whereas web forms preserve state over HTTP. Code behind is not tightly coupled with the View User Interface. Code behind is tightly coupled with the View User Interface. Net page. NET features such as authentication form and windows , authorization, membership and roles, caching, session state and profile state management.
There is a loose coupling among the three components of an MVC application that also supports parallel development. The ASP. Conclusion The selection of technology varies from person to person. If you want these benefits then you can choose the MVC model. A Web form's abstraction of the Web provides a stateful environment, while MVC is consistent with the Stateless nature of the web.
I think, testability, refactoring capability and maintainability are the main factors of any application. Now the complete decision of the team's and project's requirements to choose technology between web forms or MVC. Next Recommended Reading. Windows 10 Vs Windows Visual Studio Vs Visual Studio Understanding Matplotlib With Examples.
Understanding Numpy With Examples. C Articles. MVC Articles. Learn By Codes. Less Theory Rich Programming. So, whats the problem with ASP. There are some serious problem with ASP. Net architecture that is listed below. Performance Issue: net has slower server response, huge and complex page cycle life and consumes heavy bandwidth. Server Control: If you are an asp. Now, the simple question is why need to server control if you have light weight html control in hand.
Microsoft cleverly shows you that you are working on event driven programming architecture but in reality a server control converts itself into a simple control. For example: If you drag a text box in web forms you see the following code in. Introducing ASP.
0コメント